The Claimant was presented with neither a reason nor basis for the Intellectual Property infringements (Trademark violations) Amazon claims she has committed. Amazon’s four lawyers attacked the Claimant’s personality with malicious intention under joint names in their Brief 1, acting as if she is a criminal without presenting any evidence.
Learning from the extremely aggressive and oppressive tactics of Amazon exectives who stated that it was ‘a dirty job, but we need to do it’ against their opponents, it is clear that Amazon’s lawyers unnecesarily attacked the Claimant solely to provide excessive protection for their important client.
If these four lawyers do not submit evidence to prove their claim that the Claimant has been conducting deceptive or fraudulent or illegal activity, the Claimant will allege a human rights violation to the Japan Federation of Bar Associations (hereinafter called ‘JFBA’). The Claimant will ask the JFBA, which has placed human rights first in Article 1 of their Attorney Act, indicating they believe human rights are important and should be protected, whether they will allow their members’ act of denying human rights. The Claimant alleges that their members violated human rights by accusing their opponent without any evidence, a violation which was committed solely to protect the interests and benefits of their client – a conglomerate.
Read about this in more detail: Claimant’s Brief 14 (pp.93-102)
